What You Should Know About the United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York, 1958)

arbitration continues – Topic: recognition enforcement

As the importance of international arbitration continues to grow as a preferred mechanism for settling international commercial disputes, the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards often encounter serious obstacles—particularly when the losing party refuses to comply or recognize the award.

To address these challenges, the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) developed a set of unified international rules, resulting in a convention that establishes common legislative standards for the recognition of arbitration agreements and the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards.

The Convention’s primary objective is to eliminate discrimination between foreign and domestic arbitral awards, requiring Contracting States to recognize and enforce foreign awards in their jurisdictions in the same manner as domestic awards.

A secondary objective is to ensure that arbitration agreements are fully effective, by requiring courts of Contracting States to refer parties to arbitration when a valid arbitration agreement exists—thus preventing either party from resorting to litigation in breach of their agreement to arbitrate disputes.

The United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards—commonly known as the New York Convention (1958)—was adopted in New York on June 7, 1958. To date, 172 countries have signed or acceded to it.

The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia acceded to the Convention on April 19, 1994, with a reservation to paragraph 3 of Article I, and by doing so, made the Convention part of its domestic arbitration law.

Undoubtedly, encouraging foreign investment requires that a State be party to this Convention—so that investors can be confident that any foreign arbitral award rendered in relation to an investment dispute will be recognizable and enforceable in the host State. This aligns with one of the core goals of Saudi Vision 2030, which emphasizes creating an attractive investment environment.

To better understand the Convention, we must examine:

• What is its scope of application?
• What obligations does it impose on States regarding recognition and enforcement?
• What are the conditions for obtaining recognition and enforcement?
• And in what cases may recognition or enforcement be refused?

A. Scope of Application

Article I of the Convention defines its scope and clarifies that the term “arbitral awards” covers not only awards made by arbitrators appointed for specific cases but also awards issued by permanent arbitral bodies to which parties have submitted their disputes.

Thus, the Convention applies whether the dispute arises between natural or legal persons, whether public or private, and whether the dispute stems from contractual or non-contractual relations. It applies to both ordinary arbitration and conciliation-based arbitration, regardless of whether the parties are nationals of the same State or different States.

The nationality of the parties is irrelevant—the Convention applies even if both parties belong to one of the States in which the award was made or is sought to be enforced, or to a third State altogether.

While the Convention does not require that the dispute be commercial under the domestic law of the State concerned, it allows States, through a commercial reservation (Article I(3)), to limit its application to commercial disputes as defined by their national legislation.

B. Obligations of Contracting States Regarding Recognition and Enforcement

The Convention imposes several obligations on Contracting States and their courts concerning the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards:

1. Recognition of Arbitration Agreements
   Contracting States must recognize any written agreement between parties to submit to arbitration all or certain disputes arising—or that may arise—between them in respect of a defined legal relationship, whether contractual or not, concerning a matter capable of settlement by arbitration.
   The term “written agreement” includes an arbitration clause in a contract or a separate arbitration agreement, signed by the parties or contained in an exchange of letters or telegrams.
2. Recognition and Enforcement of Awards
   States must recognize arbitral awards as binding and enforce them according to the procedural rules of the territory where enforcement is sought, under the conditions specified in the Convention.
   States may not impose more onerous conditions or higher fees than those applicable to domestic arbitral awards.
3. Referral to Arbitration by National Courts
   When a court of a Contracting State is seized of a dispute concerning a matter covered by an arbitration agreement, it must refer the parties to arbitration upon request, unless it finds that the agreement is null, void, inoperative, or incapable of being performed.

C. Conditions for Recognition and Enforcement

To obtain recognition and enforcement of a foreign arbitral award, the requesting party must satisfy the following procedural requirements:

1. Submission of the Original Award
   The party seeking recognition and enforcement must produce the duly authenticated original award or a duly certified copy thereof.
2. Submission of the Arbitration Agreement
   The requesting party must also provide the original written arbitration agreement (or a duly certified copy).
3. Translation Requirement
   If the award or the arbitration agreement is not in the official language of the country where enforcement is sought, the applicant must provide a certified translation of both documents.
   Such translations must be certified by an official or sworn translator, or attested by a diplomatic or consular agent.

D. Grounds for Refusal of Recognition or Enforcement

Although the general rule of the Convention is mandatory recognition and enforcement, Article V allows the party against whom enforcement is sought to request refusal of recognition or enforcement by proving one of the following grounds:

1. Invalid Arbitration Agreement or Lack of Capacity
   One of the parties to the arbitration agreement was, under the law applicable to them, under some incapacity, or the agreement itself is invalid under the law to which the parties have subjected it.
2. Due Process Violation
   The party against whom the award is invoked was not properly notified of the appointment of the arbitrator or of the arbitration proceedings, or was otherwise unable to present their case.
3. Excess of Authority
   The award deals with a dispute not contemplated by or not falling within the terms of the arbitration agreement, or contains decisions on matters beyond the scope of the submission to arbitration. However, partial recognition or enforcement may be granted for the portion of the award that concerns issues properly subject to arbitration.
4. Irregular Composition or Procedure
   The composition of the arbitral tribunal or the arbitral procedure was not in accordance with the parties’ agreement or, failing such agreement, with the law of the country where the arbitration took place.
5. Award Not Yet Binding or Set Aside
   The award has not yet become binding on the parties or has been set aside or suspended by a competent authority in the country where, or under the law of which, the award was made.

Additionally, Article V(2) allows refusal of recognition or enforcement if the ompetent authority in the country where enforcement is sought finds that:

1. Non-Arbitrability: The subject matter of the dispute cannot be settled by arbitration under the law of that country; or
2. Public Policy: Recognition or enforcement of the award would be contrary to the public policy of that country.

References

1. Preamble, United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York, 1958) – UNCITRAL Official Website (accessed September 28, 2025, 12:52 p.m.).
2. Dr. Mahmoud Samir Al-Sharkawi, International Commercial Arbitration: A Comparative Legal Study, Dar Al-Nahda Al-Arabiya, 2011, p. 558.
   3–6. Dr. Mohsen Shafiq, International Commercial Arbitration, Dar Al-Nahda Al-Arabiya, 1997; Dr. Abdel Hamid Al-Ahdab, Arbitration by Conciliation, Arab Arbitration Journal, No. 3; Dr. Fathi Wali, Arbitration in National and International Commercial Disputes, 2014.
   7–15. Articles 2–5, New York Convention (1958).